Is the Labor Force Shrinking Due to Boomer Retirement? (Not Mostly)

Every month when the BLS releases the employment report, I dig into the data and tweet about it at length using the hashtag #BLSFriday. (Follow me on Twitter to catch this incredibly exciting data dive. The next one is on June 1st.)

If you’ve been following the job numbers closely, you’ll know that this recession we’ve seen a particularly sharp drop in labor force participation. Labor force participation measures how many people either have a job or are looking for a job as a percentage of the population. As of March 2012 labor force participation has dropped to 63.6%, the lowest point since December 1981.

Because the unemployment rate doesn’t measure people who aren’t in the Labor Force, many (especially conservatives) have noted that the unemployment rate is “artificially” low and that many have left the labor force, basically giving up even looking for a job.

One Twitter friend, @rizzuhjj, pointed out that the Chicago Fed has a paper that claims that half of the post-1999 decline in the labor force is due to long-term demographic trends, specifically, Baby Boomers aging.

Here is a chart of the labor force participation rate since it the last time it was this low. You can see that we’re at the point where Boomers are starting to retire, so surely that would be driving the massive drop in labor force participation and not due to the recession, right?


To test this, I decided to sift through the employment data by age, as provided by the BLS. In January 2008, the participation rate by age looked like this (click to enlarge).


(The outline is a rough approximation of where Baby Boomers land in the data. Which is OK because the Baby Boomers are an approximate age group anyway.)

You can see that the boomers are largely entering the age ranges where participation in the labor force drops off significantly. So, on the surface, this explanation makes sense.

This was my test: Take the participation rates for post-Baby Boomers (16-49 year old) and multiply them for the corresponding populations for those ages. That way we’ve isolated just the post-Baby Boomer labor force and can see if it is smaller now than it was 3 years ago. This is what I found.


Or, to make it a little clearer, this is the change in labor force participation by age since January 2008.


Apply the January 2008 participation rates to current population and this means we are missing 3.4 million post-Baby Boom workers from the labor force. These post-Boomers account for 68% of the “missing” work force.

If labor force participation was dropping only due to Baby Boomer retirement, the rate should have dropped from 66.2% in January 2008 to 64.8% today. Instead, it is 63.6%. There is certainly a good deal of room for improvement to get younger people back into the labor force. We shouldn’t simply push the problem off to being Boomer retirement or we risk ignoring a whole generation that is unemployed and flying under the radar.


  1. Scott says:

    Noticing the largest change is in the 16-19 age range, I wonder how much of the labor force participation drop is due to the increased minimum wage.

  2. dbp says:

    I doubt it would make much of a difference, but the increments in the bar charts are for 5-year spans and the time between the two charts is only 4 years. Any thoughts on if this would skew the results? And if so, in which direction?

  3. John Thacker says:

    It actually seems like Boomers are postponing retirement, if anything.

  4. […] might think that this drop is at least partially due to the aging baby boomers, but as pointed out here, more Americans over the age of 60 are in the workforce than ever […]

  5. […] might think that this drop is at least partially due to the aging baby boomers, but as pointed out here, more Americans over the age of 60 are in the workforce than ever […]

  6. […] but their labor force participation hasn’t fallen off quite as sharply, as Political Math showed in this post from May: (Source: […]

  7. chris says:

    Surely some of the boomers are out of the workforce because of the economy, and not by choice, so your 68% has to be low. I would argue that those close to retirement are tending to desire to stay in the workforce longer due to decreasing value of assets, (as can be seen by the increase in LFPR in the 60+ groups) and so the “boomer effect” is causing an under-count of the rate. Put another way, if the economy was in full recovery, and in light of the decreased value of homes and realization by many that old age security means working a few more years, more boomers would be choosing to continue working longer than in the past. I think that if the economy was in full recovery, the LFPR would be going up, not down, because the large portion of people close to retirement (boomers) would be pushing the numbers up, contrary to the conventional perception.

  8. […] years, but their labor force participation hasn’t fallen off quite as sharply, as Political Math showed in this post from […]

  9. | says:

    […] this interesting article discussing the labor force from a generational context.  WonkBlog and Political Math discuss how younger workers are leaving the labor force while older ones are entering it. Via […]

  10. […] – Chart showing the percent changes in labor force participation across age groups since January 2008, via Political Math. […]

  11. […] on Is the Labor Force Shrinking Due to Boomer Retirement? (Not Mostly) for the original post on Political Math, which tells how the figures in the chart were calculated, […]

  12. […] seniors are complicating this metric, too. Political Math slices some numbers and concludes that “post-Boomers account for 68% of the ‘missing’ work […]

  13. Dominga Mcwade says:

    Baby boomer web sites are growing in popularity as more and more seniors are becoming comfortable with computers and the Internet. Baby boomers benefit from the vast amount of information they find online but those who market their products and services to Baby boomers benefit, too. With over 78-million potential customers, Baby boomer web sites have the potential to generate millions of dollars in revenue.’

    Most interesting write-up on our own web portal

  14. Joseph Szablewski says:

    When contemplating retirement the majority of us seem pre-programmed to only consider the far reaching financial implications of never bringing in an income again! But the fact of the matter is that there are many more things to consider if planning on retiring abroad, not to mention the fact that many retirees overseas pick up odd jobs and part time positions advising and assisting other expatriates with their lives and businesses anyway!.

    Check out our very own blog as well

  15. OhioCoastie says:

    It’s time to revisit this “blame Boomer retirements” meme. The Fed might be trying to candy-coat the economy with its new report, which smears the Employment-Population Ratio as “unreliable.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *