<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Cherry Pick Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalmathblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656</link>
	<description>Political Information Visualization and Other Math-y Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 03:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blow This Graph, Matt Yglesias! &#124; The Daily Caller</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-5133</link>
		<dc:creator>Blow This Graph, Matt Yglesias! &#124; The Daily Caller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-5133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] finally contracts. You can always take a snapshot of only the period of lagged decline (the far right portion of the chart), ignore what went before, and say &#8220;see, the public sector is dangerously shrinking.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] finally contracts. You can always take a snapshot of only the period of lagged decline (the far right portion of the chart), ignore what went before, and say &#8220;see, the public sector is dangerously shrinking.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luciana</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1901</link>
		<dc:creator>Luciana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[awesome post.http://www.whoisdominio.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome post.<a href="http://www.whoisdominio.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.whoisdominio.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hello! i wanted to thank you for this great read!! i am definitely enjoying every little bit of it i have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.http://www.divulgaemail.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello! i wanted to thank you for this great read!! i am definitely enjoying every little bit of it i have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.<a href="http://www.divulgaemail.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.divulgaemail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edileusa</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>Edileusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m glad we have your blog as a help.http://www.cartaodecompras.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m glad we have your blog as a help.<a href="http://www.cartaodecompras.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.cartaodecompras.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 03:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is horrible. Want to learn how to actually cherry pick http://www.shvoong.com/how-to/careers/2029954-cherry-pick/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is horrible. Want to learn how to actually cherry pick <a href="http://www.shvoong.com/how-to/careers/2029954-cherry-pick/" rel="nofollow">http://www.shvoong.com/how-to/careers/2029954-cherry-pick/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jorod</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>jorod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk about cherry-picking data, ever read this blog?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about cherry-picking data, ever read this blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what special about the 2000 start point?  It would be instructive to see the curve since 1950 or 1900, or since the data was collected in a robust fashion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what special about the 2000 start point?  It would be instructive to see the curve since 1950 or 1900, or since the data was collected in a robust fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fisk</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@BooksMoore:

That being said, saying &quot;I took office after the worst of the private sector job losses had abated and still their numbers are off from where they were three years ago at the tail end of a recession&quot; is not much of a credit to the administration either.  (That being said, assuming a roughly linear pace for private sector job gains from their recent uptick in 2011, they&#039;ll be poised to get to January 2009 levels about in time for the 2012 election.  Say it with me: &quot;Lost Decade&quot;.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BooksMoore:</p>
<p>That being said, saying &#8220;I took office after the worst of the private sector job losses had abated and still their numbers are off from where they were three years ago at the tail end of a recession&#8221; is not much of a credit to the administration either.  (That being said, assuming a roughly linear pace for private sector job gains from their recent uptick in 2011, they&#8217;ll be poised to get to January 2009 levels about in time for the 2012 election.  Say it with me: &#8220;Lost Decade&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReasonableViews</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>ReasonableViews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Matt!  Great clarification.

We&#039;ve been trumpeting this as much as we can at ReasonableViews.com.  Our &quot;Double Dip or Lost Decade&quot; article focused on the blue line, pointing out that we are below where we were 11 years ago.  There&#039;s no period since the Great Depression when something like this was true.  The key point in my mind is that the growth after the &#039;01 recession was so meager that it was wiped out entirely by the next recession.  Add to this that wages are down in real terms and the stock market is down since 2000, and you have a disastrous decade.  I suspect that most people don&#039;t step back enough to realize how bad the last 11 years have been, and I think we need to explore and understand the issue before we can solve it.  

Thanks,

Jim &amp; Evan 
http://bit.ly/sSCZjN]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Matt!  Great clarification.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been trumpeting this as much as we can at ReasonableViews.com.  Our &#8220;Double Dip or Lost Decade&#8221; article focused on the blue line, pointing out that we are below where we were 11 years ago.  There&#8217;s no period since the Great Depression when something like this was true.  The key point in my mind is that the growth after the &#8217;01 recession was so meager that it was wiped out entirely by the next recession.  Add to this that wages are down in real terms and the stock market is down since 2000, and you have a disastrous decade.  I suspect that most people don&#8217;t step back enough to realize how bad the last 11 years have been, and I think we need to explore and understand the issue before we can solve it.  </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Jim &amp; Evan<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/sSCZjN" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/sSCZjN</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooksMoore</title>
		<link>http://politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>BooksMoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1656#comment-1893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the Obama years is, in fact, a perfectly rational place to start - by way of reaction. Yglesias is seeking to counter the idiotic notion that the one sitting president is responsible for the total sum of the economic picture. That notion, obviously, begins when Obama took the oath of office. So naturally, Yglesias also begins his argument there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Obama years is, in fact, a perfectly rational place to start &#8211; by way of reaction. Yglesias is seeking to counter the idiotic notion that the one sitting president is responsible for the total sum of the economic picture. That notion, obviously, begins when Obama took the oath of office. So naturally, Yglesias also begins his argument there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
